Sunday, April 19, 2009
Disturbed Lip Piercing
Come tutte le persone povere, pago le tasse, le quali (a volte) vengono usate per far funzionare lo Stato . Parte di queste tasse sovvenzionano per esempio, le biblioteche pubbliche, dove è possibile trovare ogni tipo di testo in circolazione : manualistica, comicità, impegno, narrativa, insomma, di tutto. Ora, io in biblioteca non ci vado mai, ma sono contento che parte delle mie tasse sovvenzioni una simile istituzione culturale. Per il motivo opposto, non pago il canone RAI, nè posseggo una TV. Non c'è nothing in the state television (let alone private ones) that can be defined as cultural, or educational, or anything. Information is reduced to a grim columnist, or you can choose which opinion to agree. The facts do not understand anything, the really important things are not even mentioned, and television journalists usually lead programs where politicians, intellectuals and experts do no more than several urlarsi him, interrupting each other and creating more and more clutter in the audience . The entertainment then it's crazy: Commercial music and nothing else. Space for classical music, folk, jazz and other forms of art educational ZERO. The movies are full of violence, always and only doubled, so we avoid learning other languages \u200b\u200b(so you do not need). Why should I pay to support a TV like that? And why would I ever look at it? I prefer to use your brain, and andarmi to seek factual information on the network. I trust journalists and read what they write. The movies I watch them on your computer, as well as documentaries, and music choose me according to my tastes and my character, which requires me to always look for novelty and listen to everything. Frankly, I find the TV useless and harmful. It 's a monster, full of imaginary worlds, imaginary characters and behavioral patterns, dingy, and I highly recommend everyone, especially those who have children, you delete it. The Board di "mettere un adulto vicino ad un bambino mentre guarda la TV" è subdolo, in quanto non si fa altro che mettere un'altra persona davanti alla TV. Meglio spegnerla, anzi darle fuoco, e magari leggere libri, seguire degli autori, dei giornalisti, decidere da soli come vogliamo informarci, senza metterci nelle mani di quella macchina infernale, che, ricordo, è all'origine del potere dei vari governi, democratici e non, in tutto il mondo. Un potere che invece io reclamo, e che nel mio piccolo difendo. Il potere di decidere cosa devo sapere.
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
Manual For Sv2000 Vhs/dvd
The game is over
Gli Scacchi sono probabilmente il gioco più appassionante di tutti i tempi. C'è tutto : strategia, intelligenza, esperienza, calcolo. Una metaphor of war, perhaps even of life. To win, you have to wait, place their pieces, arrange the moves according to a plan and a team move. When you are up against a skilled opponent, it is all fun to see the defeat as it appears, from the beginning, inevitable. our songs, disunited and helpless, they fall one by one. our side is soon laid bare, our strategy, if any, reveals his naivete and his inconsistency. And nothing is worth protesting, perhaps to emphasize the cruelty and malice of our enemy, guilty of having swept both horses, or forced to give us a tower, or bringing a pawn in the bottom of the chessboard, playing from that moment with two queens. Too strong, it is worth. From a certain point on, his supremacy is such that no move can fight back. It can also make fun of us, perhaps showing some rude, but how he's wrong? we are ridiculous: the King, with two pawns against an army of towers, horses, bishops and queens who control the territory.
Oh yes, chess is certainly the metaphor of war, in which there has to be good or bad, but more organized. Chess player does not win the "morally" superior. Vince planners, who has experience and knows the game, who does not mind spending just to get an edge, but above all who moves his army together, the second one, more ruthless and invisible disegno.E is invisible, it will be more ruthless.
And now let's concentrate for a moment. We think of our country, the events of recent years, to ourselves and to our immediate future. : Which side of the board we think we are?
Gli Scacchi sono probabilmente il gioco più appassionante di tutti i tempi. C'è tutto : strategia, intelligenza, esperienza, calcolo. Una metaphor of war, perhaps even of life. To win, you have to wait, place their pieces, arrange the moves according to a plan and a team move. When you are up against a skilled opponent, it is all fun to see the defeat as it appears, from the beginning, inevitable. our songs, disunited and helpless, they fall one by one. our side is soon laid bare, our strategy, if any, reveals his naivete and his inconsistency. And nothing is worth protesting, perhaps to emphasize the cruelty and malice of our enemy, guilty of having swept both horses, or forced to give us a tower, or bringing a pawn in the bottom of the chessboard, playing from that moment with two queens. Too strong, it is worth. From a certain point on, his supremacy is such that no move can fight back. It can also make fun of us, perhaps showing some rude, but how he's wrong? we are ridiculous: the King, with two pawns against an army of towers, horses, bishops and queens who control the territory.
Oh yes, chess is certainly the metaphor of war, in which there has to be good or bad, but more organized. Chess player does not win the "morally" superior. Vince planners, who has experience and knows the game, who does not mind spending just to get an edge, but above all who moves his army together, the second one, more ruthless and invisible disegno.E is invisible, it will be more ruthless.
And now let's concentrate for a moment. We think of our country, the events of recent years, to ourselves and to our immediate future. : Which side of the board we think we are?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)