Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Alias 2 Phone Vibrate Test



The Northern League standard is working to promote this thing as an independent state of Padania from Italy. Apart from the irritation that provokes such an idea, I would like to explain to the supporters of the League a few simple things, basic impossibility of such a project, but also of its futility. Please follow me for a moment:

1) ok, let's say that tomorrow the Padania become an independent state. By the will of a minority (you are a minority) League. Take it for you. What form of government is planning to install? Better to know, because:

Case A: the dictatorship of the Northern League Party.

live in a democratic state, a system where your leaders decide everything. But you'll still be a minority, and then "others" are angry a lot, with the result that riots have 24 hours a day. A civil war as a minimum, which will lead, sooner or later, to overthrow the regime and the reunification of "Padania" to Italy. as usual, with a few thousand deaths.

Case B: the democratic state, with the right to vote.

At the first election, since you are a minority, lose control of the country and then the new government would bring together the so-called "Padania" Italy. as usual, with a few billion euro thrown at all.
or win the election, but not forever, and the first government antilega reunify Italy Padania. As before, with multi-billion euro thrown at all.

short, a State can not be divided in two because a minority of people decided to do it, because there are "others." It would not work even if you decide to be a majority of people, because "the other" then where you put them?

short, secession could only work if a whole population, culture, language, customs and traditions of its own, unanimously, decide to do so, and conditions to do it, here in northern Italy, the area that you continue to call Padania, there are and I fear there will never be.

So I offer you a solution a little more intelligent than the one proposed by your charismatic leader, Umberto Bossi, to be implemented in 3 phases: Phase A

: stop talking of secession, and even just thinking about it. You'll piss off a lot less people who then try to listen to your reasons, I swear, in some respects I consider sacrosanct.

Step B: Demand proper behavior and morality from the people that represent you, because as long as your leader, who speaks much of nepotism and recommended puts his handsome son (who seems to be so intelligent as to be defined by his own father "trout"), rejected and re failed to maturity, as regional advisor to € 10,000 per month, you will not do to your country of great progress . Among other things, ask yourself if your children, maybe you are graduating with good grades (so making a bunch) will never have opportunities like that. Aho, list of facts, not invented. They are also known to you, be honest.

Step C: When you have people prepared, polite able to represent you, maybe we can open a peaceful confrontation with the people trained and educated in the meantime we will correct that, "the others", we will get there (The problem it's not only yours). It shall come a great debate, where we will discover that you, members of the League, and we, others, those on the right, left and middle ground, in the end we all want the same things: a country in order, peaceful, free, with peace and tranquility for all, with a future for ourselves and our children, and we realize that the rest, after all, they were all crap. Think about it.



Wednesday, June 2, 2010

Match My Face With Others

The speaker must have the merit to do so


One of the worst disasters created by the current political, economic and social is lowering, almost insane level of any reasoning. Politicians and journalists, pseudo-intellectuals and commentators continue to fill the ears of fools talk, then urlandoseli with each other and creating confusion. The result is that you never understand how things are, and that the average Italian is accustomed to thinking in the same way, slogans, blaming all the faults of others, especially looking at the present and future world with myopia mole. To sum up, Italy is a country intellectually backward.
Well, I'll listen to my friend that I dispute the fact of seeing the negative and not to show possible solutions and instead start the new course with a statement: I

, Gio Rossi, I refuse to lower the level of my reasoning that this mass of 蠢货 represented by politicians, journalists, commentators, intellectuals and so on that fill the space on TV, in newspapers and on the web.

with due distinction, of course, not everything has to be thrown away, but I find that we must get used to think at high levels, to think ahead, and convince more people to do the same, perhaps with some effort .

then begin to suggest the vision of this beautiful site, where it is given a voice to the world's leading intellectuals, who talk about their view of things, the future of this, the most touching disparate topics

http://www.ted.com

Then, in Italy, I think one has to Beppe Grillo credited with having begun to talk about things sense, sustainable future of real technology in the service of mankind and the planet. In essence, although he continues to define "funny", I consider myself a very serious "thinker", which has the merit of having at least tried to lead Italy to a different intellectual plane. So:

http://www.beppegrillo.it

Now, when politicians talk about will not be heard. Should REFUSE to listen to people who do not have the slightest idea of \u200b\u200bthe future, which does not have a plan that does not have solutions, which have no real ability to be there at the helm. E 'DEMENTED and utterly meaningless that you are using thousands of hours of TV to talk about people without ideas, without culture, solely devoted to their interests, and no time for first-class intellectuals such as Dario For, Piergiorgio Odifreddi, Umberto Eco . Hours and hours of crap dedicated to football, to gossip, shopping, and virtually nothing dedicated to the intellect. Enough!

So, the plan is this: the brain on, forward thinking, listening and unconditional rejection of 农民. Who should speak have the merit to do so, and who wants to lead a country, must first show its commitment, its preparation, and while we're at, his education.

GioRossi

Ps: do not use swear words and insults I can put them. Imagine you, ok?